“Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82.” Speech at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute, New York (September 23, 2005) //. Kroes, Neelie (European Commissioner for Competition Policy). “Reputation and Imperfect Information.” Journal of Economic Theory Vol. An Introductory Guide to EC Competition Law and Practice. “Pricing and the Dominant Firm: Implications of the Competition Commission Appeal Tribunal’s Judgment in the NAPP Case.” European Competition Law Review (2003): 70–86. “The Myth of Predatory Pricing: An Empirical Study.” Antitrust Law and Economic Review Vol. “A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy.” Yale Law Journal Vol. Deer Valley Resort Co.” Brigham Young University Law Review No. “Analyzing Refusal-to-Deal Cases Under Brooke Group's Predatory Pricing Test: The Tenth Circuit Misses the Mark in Christy Sports, LLC v. International Competition Network, “Report on Predatory Pricing”: 1–43 //. “Judicial analysis of predation: the emerging trends.” Vanderbilt Law Review Vol. “Monopolization and dominance in the United States and the European Community: Efficiency, opportunity, and fairness.” Notre Dame Law Review No. “Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf Provisionally Confirms the Prohibition of Lufthansa’s Abusive Pricing Strategy.” FCO Press Release (April 10, 2002) // 10.2118/0402-0010-JPT Search in Google ScholarĢ7. “Recent Developments in Definitions of Abusive Pricing in European Competition Policy.” CMPO Working Paper Series No. “The meeting competition defence principle – a defence for price discrimination and predatory pricing.” European Competition Law Review Vol. European Competition Law Annual 2003 What is an Abuse of a Dominant Position? Hart Publishing, 2006. In: Claus-Dieter Ehlermann and Isabela Atanasiu, eds. “Rebates: Competition on the merits or exclusionary practice?”: 267–290. 10.1093/joclec/nhi009 Search in Google ScholarĢ3. “The Concurrent Application of Competition Law and Regulation: The Case of Margin Squeeze Abuses in the Telecommunications Sector.” Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2005): 355–425. “Below-cost price alignment: meeting or beating competition? The France Telecom case.” European Competition Law Review Vol. “DG Competition discussion paper on the application of Article 82 of the Treaty to exclusionary abuses” (December 2005) //. “Defining Better Monopolization Standards.” Stanford Law Review (2003): 253–344. “How to distinguish good from bad competition under article 82 EC: In search of clearer and more coherent standards for anti-competitive abuses.” Common Market Law Review No. “An economic approach to Article 82” (July 2005) //. “Proposed standards for identifying predation: Williamson’s perspective and the Court.” The Antitrust Bulletin Vol. “A Three-Step Structured Rule of Reason to Assess Predation under Article 82.” Office of the Chief Economist Discussion Paper (December 12, 2005): 1–48 //. Committee on Continuing Legal Education, 1954. Price discrimination and related problems under the Robinson-Patman act. “The Controversies of the Consumer Welfare Standard.” The Competition Law Review No. “Commission Press Release on Digital Undertakings.” IP/97/868 (October 10, 1997). “Comments of Professor Elhauge on DG Competition Discussion Paper on Exclusionary Abuses” //. “Has the Consumer Harm Standard Lost Its Teeth?” AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper MIT Sloan Working Paper No. “Consumer Interests and the Antitrust Approach to Abusive Practices by Dominant Firms.” European Business Law Review Vol. “Predatory Pricing: Strategy Theory and Legal Policy.” Georgetown Law Journal Vol. “The role of intent under article 82 EC: from ‘flushing the turkeys’ to spotting lionesses in Regent’s park.” European Competition Law Review Vol. “Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test.” Journal of Law and Economics Vol. “Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.” Harvard Law Review Vol. “Is meeting competition a defence to predatory pricing? The Irish Sugar decision suggests a new approach.” European Competition Law Review, Vol. “'Consumer Welfare' and Article 82EC: Practice and Rhetoric.” CCP Working Paper No. “The Napp Case: A study of predation?” World Competition Vol. “Predatory pricing: a proposed structured rule of reason.” European Competition Journal Vol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |